If your business pays a foreign person for anything involving film or television work, it is tempting to jump straight to a treaty table and read off a rate. That is the wrong place to start. A treaty rate only matters after you have answered two upstream questions:
- What kind of income is this? A license to use a film is taxed under different rules than a fee to a contractor who edits one.
- Where is the income sourced? Only US-source income is subject to US withholding at all. Foreign-source income is outside the system — effectively 0%.
Get those two questions wrong and the treaty rate you apply is irrelevant, because you have applied it to the wrong category or to income the US has no right to tax. This guide walks through both, in order, and shows where the treaty's film/TV rules finally come into play.
Step 1 — Classify the payment
US withholding rules treat three categories of film/TV income very differently. The single most important habit is to decide which one you are dealing with before anything else.
A royalty — a license to use a work
A royalty is a payment for the right to use intellectual property: the right to copy, exhibit, broadcast, distribute, or otherwise exploit a finished work that someone else owns.
- Example: Acme Studios, a US distributor, licenses a finished French documentary so it can stream the film to US audiences. Acme is paying for the right to use the film. That is a royalty.
Royalties paid to foreign persons are reported as fixed or determinable annual or periodical (FDAP) income and are subject to 30% US withholding under IRC §1441/§1442 unless a treaty reduces the rate. The foreign owner documents the payment and any treaty claim on Form W-8BEN (an individual) or Form W-8BEN-E (an entity).
A services payment — someone performs work
A services payment compensates a person or company for doing work: performing, directing, editing, scoring, animating, or otherwise producing something. You are buying labor, not a license.
- Example: Acme hires a freelance film editor in Berlin to cut Acme's own footage into a finished film. Acme owns the result; the editor is paid for performing a service. That is services income, not a royalty.
Services income has its own sourcing rule (below) and its own documentation. An individual contractor who wants to claim a treaty exemption from withholding on US-source personal-services income files Form 8233 — which requires a US taxpayer identification number, a 10-day IRS review window before the first payment, and US presence at or under the treaty's day threshold (often 183 days). Miss any of those and the exemption is denied, leaving the 30% statutory rate.
Business profits — an enterprise operating in the US
If the foreign payee is an enterprise carrying on business — for instance, a foreign production company — its income is generally business profits under the treaty's Business Profits article (typically Article 7). The US can tax that income only to the extent it is attributable to a US permanent establishment (a fixed place of business such as an office or studio). With no US permanent establishment and a valid treaty claim, the rate is 0%; with one, the income is taxed on a net basis as effectively connected income.
- Example: A German production company shoots part of a film in the US through a US office it maintains for the project. Its profits attributable to that US office are business profits with a US permanent establishment.
Why classification matters. Each category carries different rules, different forms (W-8BEN / W-8BEN-E for royalties and business profits, Form 8233 for an individual's services), and a different path to a reduced rate. A payment mislabeled as a royalty when it is really services — or vice versa — sends you down the wrong sourcing rule and the wrong relief mechanism.
Step 2 — Source the income (US vs foreign)
Only US-source income is subject to US withholding. If the income is foreign-source, there is nothing to withhold — the effective rate is 0%, regardless of any treaty. So after you have classified the payment, ask where it is sourced. The sourcing rule depends on the category you just chose.
Royalties are sourced by where the work is used
A royalty is US-source to the extent the intellectual property is used or exhibited in the United States (IRC §861(a)(4) / §862(a)(4)). The location of the owner, the signing of the contract, and where the payment is wired do not control — use does.
- A foreign film licensed for exhibition or broadcast to US audiences is generating US-source royalty income → potentially withholdable.
- The same film licensed only for distribution outside the US generates foreign-source royalty income → 0% US withholding.
Licensing deals are often split across territories and media, so a single agreement can produce both US-source and foreign-source royalties. Allocating a payment between US and non-US use — or sorting out broadcast versus theatrical versus streaming rights — can get genuinely complicated. Keep the allocation reasonable and well documented, and consult a qualified tax advisor for complex or multi-territory licensing structures.
Services are sourced by where the work is performed
Services income is US-source to the extent the services are performed in the United States (IRC §861(a)(3) / §862(a)(3)). Where the customer is, where the contract was signed, and where the payee is resident do not matter — the place of performance does.
- The Berlin editor who does all the cutting in Germany is earning foreign-source income → 0% US withholding, even though Acme is a US company.
- If that same editor flew to Los Angeles and did the work in the US, the portion performed in the US would be US-source and within the withholding system.
Because only the US-performed portion is US-source, a contractor who works partly in the US and partly abroad has only the US portion exposed to withholding.
Step 3 — Only now does the treaty's film/TV rate apply
Suppose you have worked through Steps 1 and 2 and concluded the payment is a royalty that is US-source (the film is used or exhibited in the US). Only at this point does the treaty's specific film/TV treatment decide the rate — and film/TV is the one royalty subtype where treaties most often depart from their general royalty rule.
There are two different mechanisms treaties use to carve film/TV out, and they produce different results:
- Mechanism A — film/TV is removed from the Royalties article entirely. It lands either in Business Profits (0% with no US permanent establishment, on a valid Business-Profits claim) or with no treaty rate at all (30%).
- Mechanism B — film/TV is removed only from a 0% copyright sub-rate but stays in the Royalties article, falling back to the article's general royalty rate. The US–Canada treaty is the classic example: copyright royalties are generally 0%, but motion-picture and TV-use works fall back to the general 10% rate under Article XII — still a royalty, claimed on the Royalties article, not Business Profits.
These two mechanisms look similar but route the income differently and can mean the difference between 0%, the general rate, and 30%. They have their own companion guide — see How treaties carve film and TV out of the Royalties article for the full treatment and the verified list of which treaties use which mechanism.
The athlete and entertainer wrinkle — don't misclassify a performer's fee
There is one trap that sits outside the royalty-versus-services-versus-business-profits analysis above, and it catches people who work in film and TV: payments to a foreign performer for personally performing in the US.
Most US income-tax treaties contain a separate Artistes and Sportsmen article (commonly Article 17) that lets the US tax a foreign entertainer's or athlete's US-performance income regardless of the normal services or business-profits rules. So a foreign actor's fee for appearing on a US set, or a musician's fee for a US performance, is governed by Article 17 — it does not become a royalty just because the result ends up on film, and a Form 8233 services-exemption claim rarely helps. (Where the numbers are large, a Central Withholding Agreement on Form 13930 can align withholding with the performer's expected actual tax.)
The practical warning: a payment to a performer is not a license to use a work, even though it produces one. Run it through Article 17, not the royalty analysis. For the mechanics, see How Article 17 taxes foreign athletes and entertainers.
The decision flow, in order
Put together, the analysis for any film/TV payment to a foreign person runs in this sequence:
- Is the payee a performer being paid for a US performance? If yes, stop — this is Article 17 income (see the entertainer guide), not a royalty or ordinary services question.
- Classify the payment: a license to use a work (royalty), a contractor doing work (services), or an enterprise's profits (business profits)?
- Source it:
- Royalty → sourced by where the work is used/exhibited. US use → US-source. Non-US use → 0%.
- Services → sourced by where the work is performed. US performance → US-source. Work done abroad → 0%.
- Business profits → US-taxable only via a US permanent establishment; none → 0%.
- If — and only if — you have a US-source royalty, apply the treaty's film/TV mechanism (A or B) to get the rate.
Work the steps in order and the treaty rate falls out at the end. Skip to the rate table first, and you risk withholding 30% on foreign-source income that the US can't tax, or 0% on US-source income that it can.
Continue reading
Stop guessing at withholding rates.
TaxCrossing applies IRS rules and treaty rates to your foreign payments — and shows the citation behind every decision.
This article is for general educational purposes and is not legal or tax advice. Withholding outcomes depend on the specific facts of each payment. Consult a qualified tax professional before making withholding decisions.